According to the HSE (2001), a hazard can be defined as something that has the potential to cause harm or adverse effects. A risk on the other hand, is referred to as the possibility of experiencing harm, loss or danger (Yates and Stone, 1992).
The aim of a risk
assessment is to suitably identify the risks involved with an activity and
develop methods of managing them (Barton, 2007). In other words, they are put
in place to ensure that hazardous tasks are carried out safely and in line with
legislation. In relation to the
measurement of the level of risk, Mortlock (1984) stated that
‘anything that exists, exists in some quantity and can therefore be measured’. The
risk assessment takes into account the level of risk associated with each
section of the session, and is measured through the following equation:
Probability x Consequence
Since the students
taking part in this session are relatively young, and they have limited
knowledge of using certain equipment, the general risks involved tend to be higher. However,
once extra control measures were put in place, most of the actions became
moderate-low level risks. Although it is essential
to carry out an assessment before an activity commences, it is just as, if not
more important to constantly monitor the level of risks and maintain a
continuous balance of the risks as the session progresses. This is known
as a dynamic risk assessment (Hodgson & Berry, 2011). Evaluating the weather
is a prime example of where a dynamic risk assessment is vital. Although we are
partially able to plan ahead in terms of weather due to forecasts, we can never
be completely sure that it will be constant throughout the session. The session outlined below was postponed due to poor weather on the day it was due to take place, and was re-arranged for a clearer night.
Figure 1. Risk Assessment scoring categories
Task
step
|
Hazards
Identified
|
Score –
No controls
|
Control
measures
|
Score -
Post Controls
|
Further
action or changes required during/ after event?
|
Post
event score
|
Searching for Hazel Tree and cutting
down branches
|
Slips, trips, falls
|
8
|
Use the paths or instruct children to
look where they are walking and avoid certain areas.
|
3
|
No further action required, children
were sensible about where they were walking.
|
1
|
Thorns, thistles piercing skin
|
4
|
Appropriate clothing should be worn,
children should be aware to look out for hazardous plants
|
3
|
No further action required.
|
1
|
|
Branches falling when they are cut
causing injury to head/ other
|
12
|
Group to be standing away from where
the branch is. One person to hold branch whilst it is being cut so it does
not fall onto people.
|
6
|
No further action required. However,
one child did accidently hit his friend on the head with a stick. He then
realised that it was not appropriate to be waving sticks around near other
people.
|
2
|
|
Using secateurs, slipping or misusing
and causing injury
|
12
|
Children instructed how to carry and
use tools correctly and safely. Gloves to be worn when using tools.
|
4
|
No further action required. The
children worked well together and helped each other out when using equipment
|
2
|
|
Removing bark from hazel
|
Slipping when using peelers or
secateurs and cutting yourself
|
8
|
Peel or cut away from body, making
sure fingers are out of the way.
|
2
|
Children sat in a group with adequate
space around each person so they each had room to work carefully.
|
1
|
Placing tin containing debarked hazel
on the fire
|
Burns
|
12
|
Heat protection gloves to be worn and
be cautious when close to the fire.
|
6
|
This was done by an adult on the
evening.
|
4
|
Searching for larger tree branches to
make counters in the dark and chopping them down
|
Slips, trips and falls
|
12
|
Use the designated footpaths in the
dark so as not to get lost. Appropriate footwear to be worn and sensible
behaviour when searching for branches.
|
4
|
No further action required.
|
2
|
Slipping when using shears/ misusing
them
|
16
|
Gloves to be worn when cutting
branches, head-torch should be worn to make cutting easier and more accurate.
|
6
|
We searched for a tree that was near
the footpath so it was easy to access and chop down.
|
3
|
|
Falling branches – head or other
injury
|
16
|
All available light to be shining on
or near the branch that is being cut.
|
6
|
Children held the branch whilst it’s
being cut so that it didn’t fall onto them.
|
3
|
|
Using saws to cut branches into
smaller pieces in the dark
|
Slipping/ misusing and causing major
injury
|
20
|
All children to adopt the ‘safety
position’ when using saws. Working together in pairs to help each other guide
the saw through the branches and avoid injury. Pairs to be spread out so as
not to obstruct others in the group.
|
9
|
We worked as a group of four when
using the saw as it was difficult in the dark, and it was necessary to have
adult supervision during all use of it. I helped the group by holding the
branch still whilst one pair cut the branch using the saw together. The other
pair shone their torches on the saw so that everyone could see well enough.
We then swapped over so both pairs got to use the equipment.
|
3
|
Debarking ‘counters’ using knives and
peelers in the dark
|
Cuts, grazes, minor injury
|
8
|
Using any available light so it’s
easier to see. Knives and peelers to be used away from the body, making sure
fingers are not obstructing.
|
2
|
No further action required.
|
1
|
Throughout the evening, a dynamic
risk assessment was necessary. This involved having all my senses constantly
alert in order to gain as much information about the surrounding environment as
possible. For example, any changes in weather, children’s physical, mental and
emotional condition and terrain were constantly being monitored. Dynamic risk
assessments are important as changes are sometimes required during events to
ensure the smooth running of them. There were aspects of the evening that had
to be altered, such as only using one saw at a time due to poor visibility.
This meant that there was adequate adult supervision and therefore there was
less possibility of an injury occurring. It also contributed to the learning
intention of encouraging the children to work together as a team. Each child
had a specific job when we were cutting the branches e.g. one person was on
light duty shining the torch at the saw, one child was collecting the pieces we
were cutting, and the other two children were using the saw together. Overall,
the evening ran smoothly and the learning outcomes appear to have been
achieved.
References
Barton, B. (2007). Safety, risk and adventure in
outdoor activities. London: Paul Chapman. p59
Hodgson,
C. and Berry, M. (2011). Adventure
education: an introduction. London: Routledge. p46-62.
Mortlock, C. (1984). The
Adventure Alternative. Milnthorpe: Cicerone Press Ltd.
Yates and Stone
(1992) Cited in: Vertzberger, Y. (1998). Risk
Taking and Decision Making. California: Stanford University Press.